Originally Posted: 12/3/2025

On November 26, 2025, two members of the West Virginia National Guard were shot in D.C. Various reports confirm the individual accused of the shooting is an Afghan national who was screened and vetted prior to entry under the Operation Allies Welcome program in 2021 after serving alongside U.S. Special Forces for 10 years and later granted asylum in April 2025. This event set off a flurry of social media posts by President Trump and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem calling for additional measures to protect national security and DHS was quick to respond with multiple policy updates in the following days.  

Impacted Countries:

A travel ban impacting 19 countries was implemented June 9, 2025 by Presidential Proclamation 10949, which remains in effect. The 19 travel ban countries named in PP 10949 are considered “countries of concern” as it relates to the policy updates and restrictions imposed in the wake of the D.C. shooting. New restrictions outlined below thus apply to individuals from the following countries: Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. 

New restrictions on individuals from countries of concern: 

• Reexamination of green card holders. On November 27, 2025, it was announced via social media that USCIS will conduct a “full scale, rigorous reexamination of every green card for every alien from every country of concern” (referring to the 19 travel ban countries). 
  • According to a Policy Memo released on December 2, 2025, the reexamination process could include an interview, or re-interview, to fully reassess eligibility. The eligibility assessment may include determining whether the applicant is listed in the Terrorist Screening Dataset (TSDS), has been involved with certain criminal or related organizations or activities listed in the INA, and whether the applicant is able to establish their identity in line with PP 10949. 
  • At this time, apart from the above, no further guidance has been released to indicate the scope of permanent residents to be re-examined, the full criteria to be reviewed, or the exact process for doing so. The Policy Memo notes: “Within 90 days of issuance of this memorandum, USCIS will prioritize a list for review, interview, re-interview, and referral to ICE and other law enforcement agencies as appropriate, and, in consultation with the Office of Policy and Strategy and the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate, issue operational guidance.” 
  • Impacted case types per the Policy Memo include: “Form I-485 (Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status), Form I-90 (Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card (Green Card)), Form N-470 (Application to Preserve Residence for Naturalization Purposes), Form I-751, (Petition to Remove Conditions on Residence), and Form I-131 (Application for Travel Documents, Parole Documents, and Arrival/Departure Records).” 

• Additional scrutiny for discretionary immigration benefits. On November 27, 2025, USCIS updated its Policy Manual with guidance to consider relevant country-specific facts and circumstances in the adjudication of discretionary benefits.
  •  This guidance applies to discretionary benefit requests that are pending or filed with USCIS on or after November 27, 2025. Discretionary benefits include but are not limited to adjustment of status applications, nonimmigrant extensions of stay, and change of status requests. 
  • Updated sections of the USCIS Policy Manual state that the mere fact that an individual is from one of the 19 travel ban countries is not by itself a significant negative factor. It goes on to specify that adjudicators must consider relevant country-specific facts and circumstances, such as insufficient vetting and screening information that limit USCIS’ ability to assess the risks aliens from certain countries pose to the United States, as a significant negative factor in its discretionary analysis. Consistent with other policy guidance, it also makes clear that USCIS will “consider circumstances where an alien has endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused the views of an anti-American or terrorist organization or group, including those who support or promote antisemitic terrorism, antisemitic terrorist organizations, and antisemitic ideologies, to be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any applicable case involving USCIS discretionary analysis.” These factors are to be considered on a case-by-case basis in the totality of the circumstances, considering the relevance of those facts to the benefit request being adjudicated and the individual requesting the benefit. 

• Pause on final adjudication of all case types. On December 2, 2025, USCIS published an update implementing a pause on final adjudications on all cases and naturalization oath ceremonies for individuals from the 19 travel ban countries, and on all asylum cases, regardless of nationality. The pause is effective immediately and will remain in effect until USCIS issues further guidance on additional vetting of these nationals.  

Additional restrictions for Afghan nationals: 

In an address on November 26th, President Trump called for the “re-examination” of all Afghans who came to the U.S during the Biden Administration. On November 28^th, USCIS announced via social media that it has indefinitely halted processing of “all immigration requests” for Afghan nationals pending further review of security and vetting protocols, and the Department of State posted an indefinite halt on the issuance of non-immigrant and immigrant visas for all individuals traveling on Afghan passports. 

Other measures in response to D.C. shooting:

• Potential to expand travel ban. Bloomberg reported on December 2^nd that DHS is expected to provide a list of countries to expand the existing travel ban to include around 30 countries. See our post, “Travel Ban Impacting 19 Countries”, for more information on the current travel ban and keep an eye on that page for any updates. 

• As always, the true impact of these changes will not be known until we see how these policies and other directives are applied in practice. This is a rapidly evolving situation with further updates expected over the coming months. This page will be updated with any new information as it becomes available.